The information contained in Considering the Grid is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Spiegel & McDiarmid expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this site. Continue reading
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Search Past Posts
Tags
- 5th Circuit
- ACE
- Agency guidance
- Annual Energy Outlook
- Arctic
- Army Corps of Engineers
- Behind-The-Meter Generation
- Budget
- CAISO
- California
- carbon
- Carbon Pricing
- Carbon tax
- CCS
- CEIP
- CEQ
- Clean Air Act
- Clean Power Plan
- Climate
- Climate Change
- Coal
- Coal ash
- Comments
- Commerce
- Communities
- Compliance
- Congress
- CPP litigation
- CSAPR
- Cybersecurity
- D.C. Circuit
- Demand Response
- Department of Defense
- Distributed Energy Resources
- DOE
- DOI
- EIA
- Electric grid
- Electric industry
- Electricity
- Electric vehicles
- Energy efficiency
- Environment
- EPA
- ERCOT
- Executive Orders
- Federal Agency Reports
- Federal Courts
- Federal Power Act
- Federal Register
- FERC
- Financing
- FIP
- Fuels
- GHG emissions
- Global energy
- Grid Modernization
- HAP
- Hawai'i
- Health
- Hydro
- Infrastructure
- Initial Submittal
- International
- ISO New England
- Jobs
- Judicial review
- Keystone XL
- Marine
- Market rules
- Mass-based
- Massachusetts
- MATS
- Methane
- MISO
- Modeling
- NAAQS
- NACAA
- NARUC
- Natural Gas
- NEPA
- NERC
- Net Metering
- New York
- NSPS
- Nuclear
- NYISO
- Oil
- Paris Agreement
- Performance Based Regulation
- PJM
- President
- QER
- Rate-based
- Rate design
- Regional Haze
- Reliability
- Renewables
- Resilience
- RICE
- Rulemakings
- SIP
- Solar
- SPP
- State goals
- State PUCs
- State regulation
- Stay
- Storage
- Supreme Court
- Tax
- Technology
- Trading
- Transparency
- Transportation
- Tribes
- United Nations
- Utility Planning
- Water
- Webinar
- White House
- Wind
- World Bank
EPA Asks for Feedback on CPP Replacement Possibilities
UPDATED 12.28.2017 The ANPRM has been published in the Federal Register and is available here. Comments are due February 26, 2018.
EPA recently issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) seeking information as it considers proposing emission guidelines to limit greenhouse gas emissions from existing electric utility generating units—that is, a rule to replace the Clean Power Plan. (The repeal of the CPP is underway, with EPA accepting comments through January 16, 2018.)
The ANPRM solicits comments on substantive issues that would be at the core of any new rule developed. For example, EPA asks about the relative roles and responsibilities of states and EPA, as well as how to define the Best System of Emission Reduction and what sources would be covered by the rule. EPA says that it welcomes comments on all related topics, although it asks that comments related to the repeal of the CPP be submitted in the separate docket.
Comments on the ANPRM will be due 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
Related