The information contained in Considering the Grid is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Spiegel & McDiarmid expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this site. Continue reading
 
- Subscribe to Blog via Email
- Search Past Posts
- Tags- 5th Circuit
- ACE
- Agency guidance
- Annual Energy Outlook
- Arctic
- Army Corps of Engineers
- Behind-The-Meter Generation
- Budget
- CAISO
- California
- carbon
- Carbon Pricing
- Carbon tax
- CCS
- CEIP
- CEQ
- Clean Air Act
- Clean Power Plan
- Climate
- Climate Change
- Coal
- Coal ash
- Comments
- Commerce
- Communities
- Compliance
- Congress
- CPP litigation
- CSAPR
- Cybersecurity
- D.C. Circuit
- Demand Response
- Department of Defense
- Distributed Energy Resources
- DOE
- DOI
- EIA
- Electric grid
- Electric industry
- Electricity
- Electric vehicles
- Energy efficiency
- Environment
- EPA
- ERCOT
- Executive Orders
- Federal Agency Reports
- Federal Courts
- Federal Power Act
- Federal Register
- FERC
- Financing
- FIP
- Fuels
- GHG emissions
- Global energy
- Grid Modernization
- HAP
- Hawai'i
- Health
- Hydro
- Infrastructure
- Initial Submittal
- International
- ISO New England
- Jobs
- Judicial review
- Keystone XL
- Marine
- Market rules
- Mass-based
- Massachusetts
- MATS
- Methane
- MISO
- Modeling
- NAAQS
- NACAA
- NARUC
- Natural Gas
- NEPA
- NERC
- Net Metering
- New York
- NSPS
- Nuclear
- NYISO
- Oil
- Paris Agreement
- Performance Based Regulation
- PJM
- President
- QER
- Rate-based
- Rate design
- Regional Haze
- Reliability
- Renewables
- Resilience
- RICE
- Rulemakings
- SIP
- Solar
- SPP
- State goals
- State PUCs
- State regulation
- Stay
- Storage
- Supreme Court
- Tax
- Technology
- Trading
- Transparency
- Transportation
- Tribes
- United Nations
- Utility Planning
- Water
- Webinar
- White House
- Wind
- World Bank
 
 
			
CPP Update: Abeyance, Listening Sessions, and Climate Mayors’ Letter
On March 1, the D.C. Circuit ordered that West Virginia et al. v. EPA, No. 15-1363, the litigation surrounding the Clean Power Plan, should remain in abeyance for another 60 days. Consistent with prior orders, the court directed EPA to … Continue reading →